Grayscale is NOT buying 150% of newly minted BTC – here is the real deal

I’ve seen a few posts lately , about how Grayscale (owners of the GBTC – a trust that allows you to invest in Bitcoin via stonk exchanges) is now, post-halvening, buying up over 100% of the newly minted BTC each day based on their daily asset reporting via Twitter. This is not quite true.

One aside before I get into it… Grayscale requires you to lock up your investment of GBTC (aka mandated HODL) for 6 months. Buy it on June 1 – you can’t touch it until December.

If you look at their Q3 2019 Digital Asset Report you can see that, generally speaking, 80% of the “inflows” of capital were “in-kind” – in other words, they let you send them BTC (instead of USD) for shares in GBTC. Also, 84% of investors are institutional investors (primarily hedge funds).

So what’s happening? Hedge funds are sending BTC to Grayscale (certainly borrowed on margin) and then 6 months later, can cash it out (GBTC trades at a premium to BTC), pay back the margin loan, and pocket the remaining spread. Wash, rinse, repeat.

Assuming that the 80% in-kind percentage still holds (as reported in Q3 2019), the estimates of “150% of new bitcoin minted post halvening” are actually closer to 30%.

This is not to suggest that one entity sucking up 30% of new supply is a bad thing, it’s just a hell of a lot different than 150%!



Submitted June 24, 2020 at 11:24AM by BeakMeat https://ift.tt/2Yqulxg

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

No, Bitcoin is not controlled by a small group of investors and miners (A rebuttal to the TechSpot article)

https://preview.redd.it/vli0ofqwf6w71.jpg?width=3840&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=2a704c47375637858c27216379ae8313dadf8be8 This could be a long read. Kindly bear with me. I write this primarily in response to the TechSpot article from yesterday ( r/technology mods told me they only allow “ mainstream articles with editorial oversight and fact-checking ” so I'm sharing this here). But I’d also like to take this opportunity to write about Bitcoin more broadly as someone who has been following it for more than a decade and I’ll try to do so without complicating the conversation for anyone unfamiliar with Bitcoin. The TechSpot article cites a non-peer-reviewed National Bureau of Economic Research (NBER) working paper from Igor Makarov and Antoinette Schoar. NBER claims to be non-partisan but it is a private NPO funded by the likes of Bill Gates foundation . The chairman of NBER, Karen Horn, is a former president of the Federal Reserve Bank of Cleveland and Head of Int...
Read more

Day 9: I will post this guide regularly until available solutions like SegWit, order batching, and Lightning payment channels are mass adopted, the mempool is empty once again, and tx fees are low. Have you done your part?

BACKGROUND Segregated Witness (SegWit) was activated on the Bitcoin network August 24 2017 as a soft fork that is backward compatible with previous bitcoin transactions ( Understanding Segregated Witness ). Since that time wallets and exchanges have been slow to deploy SegWit, and the majority of users have not made the switch themselves. On Dec 18 2017 Subhan Nadeem has pointed out that: If every transaction in the Bitcoin network was a SegWit transaction today, blocks would contain up to 8,000 transactions, and the 138,000 unconfirmed transaction backlog would disappear instantly. Transaction fees would be almost non-existent once again . Mass SegWit use alone could empty the mempool, result in blocks that are not completely full, and make it possible to include transactions with $0 fee once again. On Jan 11 2018 when BTC sends went offline at Coinbase the mempool began to rapidly empty. Later in the day when service was restored there was a sharp spike up in the mempool . Subse...
Read more