Placing more emphasis on Sats

I have seen a post with this same idea on this sub before, but I think we should keep having the conversation. Since there are only 21m Bitcoins in existence, if mainstream adoption takes place 99% of the global population will not be able to hold whole coins. Therefore, it would make more sense to focus commerce from the perspective of say 100,000 satoshi rather than 0.001 Bitcoin.

I have even seen someone propose that we flip the terminology so that 100,000,000 “bitcoins” equal a whole “satoshi”.

Would this kind of approach make the protocol more palatable to a larger audience?



Submitted June 29, 2020 at 03:22AM by Pathfinder608 https://ift.tt/31sN64W

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Coinmarketcap are listing BCH sites as BTC

Under here: https://coinmarketcap.com/currencies/bitcoin/ They have links to https://bitcoin.com/ and https://forum.bitcoin.com/ which are no longer BTC sites; they're BCH sites. I'm not good at twitter and don't have many followers but I've tweeted at them here: https://twitter.com/bitplane/status/955918445014585344 Can we raise awareness of this and get them to change it please? Submitted January 24, 2018 at 02:47AM by david-song http://ift.tt/2DtOW70
Read more

15 years of BTC Power Law

5 years ago I made a post in this subreddit showing that BTC is a power law: Price=A*days^n, (days from Genesis Block), n=5.8. Many didn't believe me and said the past doesn't predict the future. Well, after 5 years it turns out that BTC continues its power law behavior with similar exponent. A power law is not another formula or model but the same mathematical behavior behind river formation, mountains growth, cities development, GDP vs population, and metabolic rate. Everything important is ruled by power laws, so BTC. BTC is a force of Nature. Here is the original post: https://www.reddit.com/r/Bitcoin/comments/9cqi0k/bitcoin_power_law_over_10_year_period_all_the_way/ https://preview.redd.it/ygtk3bb1fkac1.png?width=3211&format=png&auto=webp&s=46261e53d34b1d904f72eaf159cfaaf2999290ba ​ Submitted January 05, 2024 at 11:26AM by Econophysicist1 https://ift.tt/sdnkAoG
Read more