People keep asking me about the different types of bitcoin addresses and what they mean. Here's a simple breakdown...

A lot of people have been asking me about the different types of bitcoin addresses they see in wallets and the difference between each of them. Understandability, for a nontech person, it can be a bit confusing to see different types of addresses in their wallet and what all of it means.

Here is a simple breakthrough of the types of addresses you see in your bitcoin wallet.

Legacy: This is the original form of a bitcoin address that has been in existence ever since bitcoin.

A simple way to recognize these addresses is they all start with a "1".

Example:

1BvBMSEYstWetqTFn5Au4m4GFg7xJaNVN2

Issues:

  • Case-sensitive
  • High transaction fee due to the large size

Segwit: The second version of the bitcoin address helped save in transaction fees by reducing the transaction size.

All of these addresses start with "3".

347N1Thc213QqfYCz3PZkjoJpNv5b14kBd

Issues:

  • Case-sensitive

Native Segwit: The third edition of a bitcoin address. These addresses further reduce the fee and offer better usability by eliminating case sensitivity. They even offer an error-detection mechanism.

All addresses start with "bc1"

Example:

bc1qar0srrr7xfkvy5l643lydnw9re59gtzzwf5mdq

Issue:

  • A bug was reported in its error detection mechanism
  • Not very common with crypto exchanges

Bech32m: An updated version of native segwit, bech32m fixes the error that was in its previous version plus it supports taproot [a latest bitcoin technology development]

Issues:

  • It's a new development so support is very limited.

​

Address compatibility:

By design, all addresses are compatible with each other. It's the wallets where the bitcoin address support varies.

Most popular wallets support all 3 address types, while some others only 1 or 2. It's best to pick the wallet that supports all 3 and will also provide support for bech32m in the future.

As for the address, bech32/bech32m offers the lowest fee.

​

Source: Blockonomics - Types of Bitcoin Addresses



Submitted December 18, 2021 at 11:22PM by primalfabric https://ift.tt/3p9UXA2

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

No, Bitcoin is not controlled by a small group of investors and miners (A rebuttal to the TechSpot article)

https://preview.redd.it/vli0ofqwf6w71.jpg?width=3840&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=2a704c47375637858c27216379ae8313dadf8be8 This could be a long read. Kindly bear with me. I write this primarily in response to the TechSpot article from yesterday ( r/technology mods told me they only allow “ mainstream articles with editorial oversight and fact-checking ” so I'm sharing this here). But I’d also like to take this opportunity to write about Bitcoin more broadly as someone who has been following it for more than a decade and I’ll try to do so without complicating the conversation for anyone unfamiliar with Bitcoin. The TechSpot article cites a non-peer-reviewed National Bureau of Economic Research (NBER) working paper from Igor Makarov and Antoinette Schoar. NBER claims to be non-partisan but it is a private NPO funded by the likes of Bill Gates foundation . The chairman of NBER, Karen Horn, is a former president of the Federal Reserve Bank of Cleveland and Head of Int...
Read more

Day 9: I will post this guide regularly until available solutions like SegWit, order batching, and Lightning payment channels are mass adopted, the mempool is empty once again, and tx fees are low. Have you done your part?

BACKGROUND Segregated Witness (SegWit) was activated on the Bitcoin network August 24 2017 as a soft fork that is backward compatible with previous bitcoin transactions ( Understanding Segregated Witness ). Since that time wallets and exchanges have been slow to deploy SegWit, and the majority of users have not made the switch themselves. On Dec 18 2017 Subhan Nadeem has pointed out that: If every transaction in the Bitcoin network was a SegWit transaction today, blocks would contain up to 8,000 transactions, and the 138,000 unconfirmed transaction backlog would disappear instantly. Transaction fees would be almost non-existent once again . Mass SegWit use alone could empty the mempool, result in blocks that are not completely full, and make it possible to include transactions with $0 fee once again. On Jan 11 2018 when BTC sends went offline at Coinbase the mempool began to rapidly empty. Later in the day when service was restored there was a sharp spike up in the mempool . Subse...
Read more