Can we please not let the lntip bot turn this sub into a place for people to try to moon farm?

I’ve been seeing a lot of people posting about how cool the lntip bot is lately. I love the feature, especially since it is an incredible way to promote quality content on this sub and also exercise the Lightning Network! However, I’m seeing a lot of posts and comments that just scream “give me sats!”

I don’t know, am I the only one that is seeing this?

For example, I‘ve seen people post about how all of a sudden the lntip feature makes them SO excited to go all in on BTC. Like what!? That’s what did it for you!? I’ve also seen a lot of people ask how the bot works. IMO these types of posts/comments are just attempts to try and get people to throw sats their way.

If you don’t know, “moon farming” has turned the r/cryptocurrency sub into a place that receives literally hundreds of posts/comments each day… just to try and receive moon rewards via upvotes.

Edit: To clarify, I’m not advocating for us to stop using the lntip bot. Not at all. Sats all around! I’m just saying that I’m seeing a lot of posts/comments that seem to be going out of their way to try and get tips from this community.



Submitted December 22, 2022 at 04:05AM by NovyNovak https://ift.tt/aGAcdOJ

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

No, Bitcoin is not controlled by a small group of investors and miners (A rebuttal to the TechSpot article)

https://preview.redd.it/vli0ofqwf6w71.jpg?width=3840&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=2a704c47375637858c27216379ae8313dadf8be8 This could be a long read. Kindly bear with me. I write this primarily in response to the TechSpot article from yesterday ( r/technology mods told me they only allow “ mainstream articles with editorial oversight and fact-checking ” so I'm sharing this here). But I’d also like to take this opportunity to write about Bitcoin more broadly as someone who has been following it for more than a decade and I’ll try to do so without complicating the conversation for anyone unfamiliar with Bitcoin. The TechSpot article cites a non-peer-reviewed National Bureau of Economic Research (NBER) working paper from Igor Makarov and Antoinette Schoar. NBER claims to be non-partisan but it is a private NPO funded by the likes of Bill Gates foundation . The chairman of NBER, Karen Horn, is a former president of the Federal Reserve Bank of Cleveland and Head of Int...
Read more

Day 9: I will post this guide regularly until available solutions like SegWit, order batching, and Lightning payment channels are mass adopted, the mempool is empty once again, and tx fees are low. Have you done your part?

BACKGROUND Segregated Witness (SegWit) was activated on the Bitcoin network August 24 2017 as a soft fork that is backward compatible with previous bitcoin transactions ( Understanding Segregated Witness ). Since that time wallets and exchanges have been slow to deploy SegWit, and the majority of users have not made the switch themselves. On Dec 18 2017 Subhan Nadeem has pointed out that: If every transaction in the Bitcoin network was a SegWit transaction today, blocks would contain up to 8,000 transactions, and the 138,000 unconfirmed transaction backlog would disappear instantly. Transaction fees would be almost non-existent once again . Mass SegWit use alone could empty the mempool, result in blocks that are not completely full, and make it possible to include transactions with $0 fee once again. On Jan 11 2018 when BTC sends went offline at Coinbase the mempool began to rapidly empty. Later in the day when service was restored there was a sharp spike up in the mempool . Subse...
Read more